On December 15, I was defending rosby for being unnecessarily targeted in a badly prosecuted case, which rested on the wisdom of a grown woman taking herbs from a grown man and then complaining the pill was not the advertised herbs. Boo!
“How do I describe the District Attorney? Heinously and exploitatively ambitious.”
Most DAs are just that, Camille. Sorry.
“How do I describe the judge? Overtly and arrogantly collaborating with the District Attorney.”
Many judges do that, Camille. Sorry.
“How do I describe the counsels for the accusers? Totally unethical.”
Now, that should not be true, but, alas, Camille, that is true too.
“How do I describe many, but not all, general media? Blatantly vicious entities that continually disseminated intentional omissions of truths for the primary purpose of greedily selling sensationalism at the expense of a human life.”
Camille, they too are just like that. But, remember please, TPV always stood by Bill, too. For different reasons than yours though:
The litigious women exploited Bill as much as Bill exploited them, so let’s stop the circus. Or not.
***
By DANA NEACSU: Finally, A Grown Man Is Vindicated in Mistrial
